(Xchange) <failure notice>
|
Subject |
(Xchange) <failure notice> |
|
From |
restate <restate@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date |
Fri, 7 Sep 2001 05:43:40 +0200 |
SKINCARE. the audients.
jazzolog@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>What the heck are you using? I get nothing at your link except a framework---no content.
>What the heck are you using?
restate/skincare soothing cleansing lotion. (http://skincare.restate.org)
(i decide what's best vor your accumbing core)
>no content.
content is king. fakt.
Jim Andrews <jim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Interesting but we seem to be missing a few million graphics? Or is that
>better for the skin? Am I missing something?
ravishingly, we seem to be missing a few million dendrites.
>>certain classes of stimuli, such as food and drugs, are
>>highly effective in activating reward regions. We show in
>>humans that activity in these regions can be modulated by
>>the predictability of the sequenced delivery of two mildly
>>pleasurable stimuli, orally delivered fruit juice and water.
>>Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, the activity
>>for rewarding stimuli in both the nucleus accumbens and
>>medial orbitofrontal cortex was greatest when the stimuli
>>were unpredictable. Moreover, the subjects' stated
>>preference for either juice or water was not directly
>>correlated with activity in reward regions but instead was
>>correlated with activity in sensorimotor cortex. For
>>pleasurable stimuli, these findings suggest that
>>predictability modulates the response of human reward
>>regions, and subjective preference can be dissociated from
>>this response.
savor exacting.
(predicting your passion)
>Interesting but we seem to be missing a few million graphics? Or is that
>better for the skin? Am I missing something?
i am 0 docile dekorateur.
i am 1 polymorph pervert.
(i told you)
>Interesting but we seem to be missing a few million graphics? Or is that
>better for the skin? Am I missing something?
have you ever done a turing test?
> Am I missing something?
if a lion could talk you would not understand him.
(did you know that)
diocletian@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>hello
>
>
>i have visited your site on 3 brief occasions
i do love visitors.
do bring your friends.
(only variety will destroy variety)
>and i have a question:
>does restate.org crash many user-agents, or only netscape 4.x ?
i do love to crash you, user.
bathe in my pyroklastik protuberantsa.
w.p. <czas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
>
>d
>
>-w- :-)
(blush)
you make me so stable.
Robert Doornick, CEO of International Robotics, Inc. <DoornickR@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>Who are you?
>
>Robert
the elegant attraktor.
(that is me)
the turbulent troubarits.
(that is me)
the leading differents.
(that is me)
call me a rising star.
\ \
make-up by restate (http://skincare.restate.org)
hair styling by restate (http://skincare.restate.org)
black contact lenses by restate (http://skincare.restate.org)
ebony lace bra by restate (http://skincare.restate.org)
deep black linen pants by restate (http://skincare.restate.org)
black suede trainers by restate (http://skincare.restate.org)
radically chic.
(that is me)
.
/
\
http://www.restate.org ]
[affiliat program->> apply@xxxxxxxxxxx ]
[affiliat program>-> apply@xxxxxxxxxxx ]
apply now. why wait. let me contamine your mind.
closed iratsional minds may be rejekted.
open ratsional minds may be infekted.
.
i do bring pleasure.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) (c) (o) (u) (s) (t) (i) (c) ( ) (s) (p) (a) (c) (e)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
information&comunication channel | for net.broadcasters
http://xchange.re-lab.net (Xchange) net.audio network
xchange search/webarchive: http://xchange.re-lab.net/a/