_______________________________________________________
God_mimi.Cry_[IRC x.tracting]     06:23pm 09/03/2004
_______________________________________________________

][mood:  dirty][
][music: 3dxxxx_tweakers][
- cloning.failure.rates +validity of essentially harvesting siblings via a designer process in order to combat genetic diseases - screening.may b.acceptable +but actively engineering a child to provide bone marrow that will save another child =harvesting 
- very Brave.New.Worldish.


+
discarded.embryos [effectively "screened" + "terminated" +2 get that specific.dna.clot] 
+
dark.figure.cloning -thousands of faux.mutated animals [and probably humans] used in order 2 produce "successes".
---------------------------------------------------------------------disrupting the very fabric of functional} evolution.
- how.du.u.class deformity? +how r we to know that that very "deformity" isn't evolution on a projected scale? - mutation.is.evolution's.[m]arrow. +should we play[@] g.od[dessa] +actively select who falls into that normalisation category and who doesn't?? 


<][mez][> no
<][mez][> we won't.
-------------------------------------------------------------we.need.2.keep.a.lid on +hyperaccerlation of these so called genetic fixes that 

+
may effect [xxxx's] progression in terms of attempting 2
----------------------------------------------------------quantum.leap ^up^ the phylogenetic scale. 


(vaccinations) = a social necessity
if(then) = raising ur child as part of a mainstream westernised community
= chemical buildup/antibody reactive base
= [add.ON engineering]
<][xxxx][> ..but at least its within the parameters of an enclosed system [if u believe current scientific theory that is] <][xxxx][> nature [as in ecosystem-based] is contained, and part of that is struggle for survival and reproduction, yus? 
<][xxxxx][> eros and thantos
<][xxxx[> self-replicating [and NOT individualisation] is necessary to that system 

[housing.of.the.concept.of.evolution]
<][xxxx][> ..so i guess its playing mini-god, or god_mimickry, within parameters that allow for it, especially in terms of a more naturalised perspective. <][xxxxxxxx][> of course as humans we are so species_centric and overpopulate beyond the boom/bust cycle of resource usage [ie lemmings-style cycle of overpopulate then actively self-cull] that we fuck this delicate balance up
<][xxxxx][> we hyperaccelerate beyond the parameters defined by the strict concept of evolution. <][xxxx][> ..but _beyond_ the accepted pattern of functional species adaptation.... <][xxxxx][> the whole point of this discussion re: genetic modification is that nothing exists in isoltion 
<][xxxxx][> isolation, even
<][xxxx][> that the whole spectrum of altering *1* organisms genetic behaviour [culturally decreed as well as biologically] will effect all. 


[pinprick_evolution]















.(c)[lick].
-
-

http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker
http://www.livejournal.com/users/netwurker/


|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
(a) (c) (o) (u) (s) (t) (i) (c) ( ) (s) (p) (a) (c) (e)
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
information&comunication channel | for net.broadcasters
http://xchange.re-lab.net  (Xchange)  net.audio network
xchange search/webarchive: http://xchange.re-lab.net/a/